The Prompt Library
Attorney-reviewed prompts for Claude, ChatGPT, and Gemini. Filtered by practice area, jurisdiction, and task — with built-in anti-hallucination safeguards on every prompt.
Two-in-one demand letter prompt: a pre-litigation demand and an IP cease and desist. Firm, factual, and written like a judge will read it someday.
Draft a plaintiff-side demand letter for a New York commercial construction breach. Tested on Claude vs Gemini — Claude wins on tone and statutory precision.
Turn an appellate decision into a structured legal-research memo with holding vs dicta clearly distinguished. Tested on Claude vs Gemini — accuracy vs context tradeoff.
Turn raw facts and your theory of the case into a structured motion outline with anticipated counter-arguments and the strongest cases to cite.
Paste a fact pattern and get every viable claim, its elements, strength rating, and the missing facts you should chase down.
Have Claude play litigation partner: rate each claim 1-10, project settlement value, then dissect opposing counsel's motion citation by citation.
Generate a clear, balanced settlement memo that helps the client decide whether to accept, counter, or proceed to trial.
Get topic-organized deposition questions with foundation, fact-establishment, impeachment, and lock-in sections — plus flagged objection risks.
Generate a structured Motion to Compel Discovery with introduction, factual background, legal standard, argument, and requested relief — ready for editing.
Draft interrogatories, RFPs, or RFAs that are specific enough to enforce and broad enough to capture what you actually need.
Generates 15 FRCP Rule 33 interrogatories targeting a manufacturer's quality control, prior complaints, recall history, and internal defect communications.
Convert a factual scenario into a precise legal research question with sub-issues and key terms of art for Westlaw or Lexis searching.
Get a clean, four-part motion outline — issue framing, factual background, argument sections with sub-points, and pre-emptive rebuttals to counterarguments.
A drafting prompt for a Rule 12(b)(6) memorandum of law in the Southern District of New York invoking the business judgment rule against a fiduciary duty claim.
Identify every potential claim, defense, and counterclaim in a fact pattern using a senior-litigator persona with no case citations.
Generate the five strongest counterarguments opposing counsel could make and how to respond — strategic analysis without case citations.
Generate a concise case status update email that summarizes recent developments and upcoming steps in a tone matched to the client.
Pro members get the Prompt Runner: fill in variables, choose your model, run the prompt, and get output with anti-hallucination checks and reasoning traceability.