Gemini Prompt: Draft a Motion to Compel Discovery
Generate a structured Motion to Compel Discovery with introduction, factual background, legal standard, argument, and requested relief — ready for editing.
The Prompt
Variables (2)
| Variable | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
| {{case_name_and_number}} | Case Name and Number | Smith v. Acme Corp., Case No. 2:25-cv-04812 |
| {{court_and_jurisdiction}} | Court and Jurisdiction | U.S. District Court, Central District of California |
Expected Output
A persuasive Motion to Compel Discovery with introduction, factual background, legal standard, argument addressing each objection, and a specific request for relief including fees.
Usage Notes
Tested on Gemini 3.1 Pro: produces a clean first draft but trends verbose — edit for concision before filing. Always verify the cited discovery rules against your specific local rules and court's standing orders.
Legal Sources Referenced
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(b)(1) (proportionality)
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 37(a) (motion to compel and fee-shifting)
Originally featured in: Gemini 3.1 Pro for Lawyers: Best Prompts, Use Cases & Honest Review (2026)
Related Prompts
Claude Prompt: Pre-Litigation Demand Letter + IP Cease & Desist
Two-in-one demand letter prompt: a pre-litigation demand and an IP cease and desist. Firm, factual, and written like a judge will read it someday.
ChatGPT Prompt: Draft Interrogatories, RFPs, and RFAs for Any Case
Draft interrogatories, RFPs, or RFAs that are specific enough to enforce and broad enough to capture what you actually need.
ChatGPT Prompt: Counterargument Generator for Litigators
Generate the five strongest counterarguments opposing counsel could make and how to respond — strategic analysis without case citations.
AI Prompt: Summarize Appellate Decision into IRAC Memo (Claude vs Gemini Test)
Turn an appellate decision into a structured legal-research memo with holding vs dicta clearly distinguished. Tested on Claude vs Gemini — accuracy vs context tradeoff.