17 prompts built for attorneys: motions, briefs, discovery and deposition preparation. Every prompt ships with anti-hallucination safeguards and works with Claude, ChatGPT, and Gemini.
Drafts a pre-litigation demand letter or an intellectual property cease-and-desist letter from the facts, documents and governing text you paste. The relief and response date are yours; no law, damages theory or deadline is added from memory.
Drafts a plaintiff-side demand letter in a New York commercial construction dispute from the contract, payment records and New York statute or case text you paste. Balance, interest and cure period come only from your inputs and recomputed figures.
Turns an appellate decision you paste into an IRAC-style research memo in which every statement carries a page or paragraph marker. The holding is quoted, dicta only where the court marks it, and later history is left to your citator.
Builds a motion outline on the authorities and record cites you paste. Each argument point lists your authorities ranked by how directly their pasted text supports it, and no case is supplied from memory.
Reads a fact pattern and lists possible claims and defenses as questions to research, each tied to quoted facts and marked for authority. It states no elements and rates nothing.
Assesses a pending motion argument by argument from the briefs, record excerpts and authorities you paste. Each cited case is checked against pasted text, and probabilities and values appear only as you supply them.
Drafts a plain-language memo to the client on a settlement offer from the offer text, your fee terms and your own assessment. Net amounts are recomputed from supplied deductions, and the recommendation is yours, copied word for word.
Builds a topic-organized deposition outline for one witness from the exhibits and prior statements you paste. The questions are marker-free and tied to the documents; contradictions between the witness's own statements are set out quoted for you, not argued.
Outlines a motion to compel from the discovery requests, the responses and objections, and the meet-and-confer letters you paste. Legal standards appear only as the rule text you paste, and nothing is stated about the meet-and-confer that the correspondence does not show.
Drafts interrogatories, requests for production and requests for admission as one coordinated set from the topics, record facts and rule text you paste. Numerical limits come only from the rule text, and no request asserts a fact your record does not support.
Drafts interrogatories to a manufacturer in a house fire case from the incident records, pleaded claims and topics you paste. No defect theory or allegation appears unless your material supports it, and any limit on the number comes only from rule text you paste.
Turns a messy fact pattern and a loosely worded question into precisely framed research questions, the facts each one depends on, and search terms to run in your database. It states no answer, no doctrine and no authority.
Builds an outline of a motion from the facts with record cites, the governing rule text and the authorities you paste. Every fact carries its cite, every argument rests on pasted authority, and gaps are marked for you.
Outlines a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim in a federal court in New York, with a business judgment argument. The complaint, the governing rule text and every authority are pasted by you; nothing about the standard or the doctrine comes from the model's memory.
Turns a litigation fact pattern into a list of research questions. Each issue is tied to the facts that bear on it and carries an authority-needed marker, so the model names the questions and you find the law.
Stress-tests your draft argument. It generates the other side's best counterarguments, each tied to a record cite or an authority you pasted, then your possible replies drawn from the same material. Internal work product.
Drafts a status update email to a litigation client from the developments and next steps you supply. Each development needs a source, each date is yours, and the tone follows the client profile you pick. No predictions, no advice.
Pro members get the Prompt Runner: fill in variables, choose your model, and get output with anti-hallucination checks.
See Plans* These prompts are drafting and analysis aids for licensed attorneys. They are not legal advice and do not replace professional judgment. AI output can contain errors, including invented citations and incorrect deadlines: verify every fact, figure, authority and deadline against primary sources before relying on it. Rules vary by jurisdiction, and you remain responsible for the final work product.