Introductory pricing available through December 31, 2026 — rates lock in at sign-up.View Plans
Professionalmodel-agnosticlitigationgeneral-us

Litigation Issue Spotter: Research Questions From Your Fact Pattern

Turns a litigation fact pattern into a list of research questions. Each issue is tied to the facts that bear on it and carries an authority-needed marker, so the model names the questions and you find the law.

The Prompt

Variables (6)

VariableDescriptionExample
{{client_role}}Client and RoleNorthgate Components LLC, defendant
{{forum}}Forum and Governing Law, If KnownState court, Cook County; the contract names Illinois law
{{fact_pattern}}Fact PatternOn March 14, 2026, the buyer says 10,000 units were not delivered under the written supply agreement.
{{documents}}Documents With DatesPaste the contract clauses, pleadings and correspondence, each with its date.
{{authority}}Pasted AuthorityPaste statute, rule or decision text you already have, or leave blank.
{{notes}}Attorney Notes and ConcernsConcerned about whether notice of the late delivery was ever given.

Expected Output

Fact register, conflicts, count and time check, then the issue list: each issue as a plain-language research question with facts for, facts against, facts missing and an authority-needed marker, then declined requests, missing information and a verification list.

Usage Notes

Use after you have gathered the facts and before formal research. Paste the pleadings, contract text or notes with the fact pattern so each fact has a source. The issues come back as questions, not as elements or conclusions: do not read an issue as a statement of what the law requires. Watch for facts the notes assert without a document behind them. Not legal advice. The attorney remains responsible for verifying every fact, figure and authority before use.

Originally featured in: How to Use AI for Legal Research Safely in 2026: The Complete Workflow

Related Prompts

* These prompts are drafting and analysis aids for licensed attorneys. They are not legal advice and do not replace professional judgment. AI output can contain errors, including invented citations and incorrect deadlines: verify every fact, figure, authority and deadline against primary sources before relying on it. Rules vary by jurisdiction, and you remain responsible for the final work product.