12 prompts built for attorneys: motions, plea agreements and sentencing memoranda. Every prompt ships with anti-hallucination safeguards and works with Claude, ChatGPT, and Gemini.
Turns the charging document, arrest report and intake notes into an internal memo: each charge with elements from statute text you paste, the facts alleged for each element and their source, custody status, immediate tasks and client questions.
Compares police reports, supplemental reports, witness statements and any transcript: one timeline with every time stamp and source, each inconsistency quoted side by side, facts asserted with no stated basis of knowledge, items referred to but not produced, and follow-up discovery to request.
Converts a body-camera or interview transcript into a neutral, time-stamped chronology: who said what, quoted, moments to review tagged without any legal conclusion, time-stamp gaps counted and inaudible passages listed.
Builds a suppression motion outline from the record: the evidence at issue, the sequence of police conduct with quotes and time stamps, each ground with the authority you paste or an authority-needed marker, the prosecution's likely facts, hearing witnesses and exhibits, and proposed findings.
Drafts the discovery demand letter to the prosecutor: an inventory of what you received, the items the reports refer to but the prosecution has not produced, specific requests tied to those references and the legal basis only as you paste it. Attorney-only notes come first and the letter follows.
Outlines a motion for release or bond reduction: the current conditions, the release factors exactly as the statute or rule text you paste states them, the documented facts for each factor with sources, proposed conditions, and documents and witnesses to bring. Nothing on the alleged offense beyond the charging document.
Builds an internal memo comparing a plea offer with trial, using only the offer, the statute or guideline text and the evidence assessment you paste. Collateral consequences come back as questions with an authority-needed marker, and the model predicts no conviction odds and no sentence.
Drafts the letter that conveys a plea offer to the client for decision. The offer is restated in plain English, the alternatives are in your words, unknowns are listed, and a signature block records the client's decision. No pressure, no prediction and no legal consequence from memory.
Builds a cross-examination outline for a police witness from the officer's reports, prior testimony and the recordings transcript. Leading, one-fact questions, impeachment chapters built on quoted inconsistencies, and omissions only where the documents show them.
Outlines a sentencing memorandum for the defense from the records, treatment letters and character letters you paste. Each mitigating fact carries its source, the sentence requested is yours, and the sentencing factors appear only as the pasted text states them.
Prepares your first client interview from the charging document and the reports in hand. Topics are grouped by subject with neutral open-ended questions, documents and contacts to request, and matters you must explain yourself, with every answer box left empty.
Checks sealing or expungement eligibility strictly against the statute text you paste: each condition quoted, the matching record fact with its source, waiting periods computed from supplied dates, disqualifying entries and missing records. With no statute pasted it concludes nothing.
Pro members get the Prompt Runner: fill in variables, choose your model, and get output with anti-hallucination checks.
See Plans* These prompts are drafting and analysis aids for licensed attorneys. They are not legal advice and do not replace professional judgment. AI output can contain errors, including invented citations and incorrect deadlines: verify every fact, figure, authority and deadline against primary sources before relying on it. Rules vary by jurisdiction, and you remain responsible for the final work product.