36 prompts built for attorneys: demand letters, medical summaries and settlement analysis. Every prompt ships with anti-hallucination safeguards and works with Claude, ChatGPT, and Gemini.
Drafts a short, warm client status email that leads with the most important update, uses only developments your documents support, and leaves every timeline and date you did not supply for you to complete.
Turns pasted medical records into a dated, source-quoted treatment chronology with recomputed visit counts and durations, treatment gaps listed without invented explanations, and conflicts between records shown, never resolved.
Drafts a warm, jargon-free welcome letter that explains the process, restates your fee terms exactly as pasted, lists what you need from the client and gives your own do and do-not guidance, leaving anything you did not supply for you to complete.
Audits pasted medical billing records into a date-sorted itemization with provider subtotals, totals recomputed before any stated total is read, duplicates and pre-incident charges excluded with the subtraction shown, and unsupported charges flagged.
Builds a phone-ready intake screening form for a new PI inquiry: liability and damages questions, red-flag prompts, document requests, evidence-preservation steps and a scoring grid with your threshold applied exactly, and every limitation date left for you to verify.
Drafts numbered interrogatories to a personal injury defendant, each tied to its source and the element it serves, sized against the numerical limit only if you paste the governing rule, with limits, timing and format left for you to confirm.
Builds an internal deposition preparation plan from the record you paste (topic map, record-based risk areas, prior history, social media and surveillance exposure) and a plain-language guide for the client that coaches process, never answers.
Builds a deposition outline for the defense medical examiner from the IME report, treating records and CV you paste. Questions are tied to exhibits and sources, and the questions to be asked aloud are separated from attorney-only strategy notes.
Builds a defendant driver deposition outline in XML-structured form from the police report, statements and records you paste. Impeachment points quote their source, no prior testimony is invented, and the questions to be asked aloud are kept clean.
Compares an insurer's offer with your demand and with the trial scenarios you supply. It recomputes net-to-client under your fee terms, costs and liens, uses only your probabilities and values, and lists the decision points for you and the client.
Builds the damages section of a PI demand letter from the bills, wage documents and future-care support you paste. Totals are recomputed, undocumented items are excluded, and non-economic damages use only the method and figures you supply.
Reviews the medical records you paste and extracts every statement that bears on causation, quoted with date and page, in the categories that matter: provider opinions, recorded patient history, timing, prior history, aggravation and adverse language. It gives no medical opinion.
Draft personal injury requests for production to the defendant from your own case facts, with definitions, protective-order flags and a count check against the rules you paste.
Generate a full personal injury demand letter with recomputed itemized damages, using only the valuation method, demand and response date you supply.
Draft a soft tissue demand letter answering minor-damage, treatment-gap and prior-condition objections from the records, with the aggravation rule taken only from text you paste.
Run an internal personal injury valuation that recomputes economic damages and builds scenarios only from the comparables, ranges and rule text you supply.
Draft an empathetic but firm client email recommending rejection of a personal injury settlement offer, built only on your figures, counter and dates.
Turns intake notes and the documents in hand into a candid internal evaluation memo: liability by element, comparative fault exposure, documented versus undocumented damages, collectability, evidence to preserve, and an accept / decline / investigate recommendation.
Builds the deadline and notice checklist for a new PI matter using only the statute text and dates you paste. Every period without supplied text is marked [VERIFY DEADLINE], every computed date shows its arithmetic, and tolling issues come back as questions.
Separates the client's documented baseline from post-incident findings, builds a quoted before/after comparison for each body part, anticipates the defense reading of the same records, and drafts the questions to put to the treating physician.
Itemizes every recommended future treatment from treating-provider records and any life care plan, with the source quote, frequency, duration and unit cost only where a source supplies it. Unsourced costs are marked, never estimated.
Computes past lost wages from pay records, employer letters, tax documents and disability notes with every step of arithmetic shown, reconciles the documents against each other, and separates future earning capacity into a list of what the economist or vocational expert must supply.
Turns client interview notes, a symptom diary and witness statements into a specific before/after narrative of daily-life impact for a demand package. Every sentence is traceable to a source, tied to dated records where they exist, with no unsupported adjectives and no dollar figure.
Drafts a time-limited policy-limits demand that can be accepted exactly as written, and checks every term against the governing statute or case text you paste in. It states no state requirement or bad-faith standard on its own.
Drafts an uninsured or underinsured motorist claim letter to the client's own carrier from the policy text you paste, and flags every notice, exhaustion and consent-to-settle condition whose compliance is not shown in your materials.
Audits every lien and reimbursement claim on a settlement (Medicare, Medicaid, ERISA or other health plan, provider liens, med-pay), isolates unrelated charges and arithmetic errors, then drafts the reduction request. It never says a doctrine applies without the governing text.
Tests each reason the adjuster gave against your demand package, separates the reasons the record answers from the ones that expose a real weakness, proposes a counter using only your figures, and drafts the response letter.
Checks the arithmetic of a settlement closing statement against the fee agreement terms, costs and liens you supply, flags anything that does not reconcile, then writes a plain-English letter explaining each line to the client.
Drafts the letter that puts a settlement offer in front of the client for decision: the offer and its terms, a net-to-client estimate with the arithmetic shown, the risks of accepting and of rejecting as you describe them, and a signature block recording the choice.
Drafts a negligence complaint from your facts, with every allegation traced to a supplied fact, each element mapped to its supporting paragraphs, and a gap table for elements with no fact behind them.
Drafts single-fact requests for admission that narrow the dispute, each tied to the evidence behind it and the element it helps prove, with the numerical limit and timing left for you to confirm.
Compares the requests you served with the responses and objections you received, classifies every deficiency with both texts quoted, and drafts the meet-and-confer letter with your response date.
Builds a deposition outline for a defense IME physician, biomechanical engineer or accident reconstructionist from the report and CV: bias, materials not reviewed, methodology, and every assumption set against the quoted record.
Drafts the plaintiff's mediation statement: liability in evidence order, damages with documented totals and visible arithmetic, the defense's best arguments answered from the record, and a separate confidential section for the mediator.
Outlines motions in limine item by item: the evidence, the ground, the authority you supplied or a flag where authority is needed, the record foundation, the anticipated opposition and proposed order language.
Builds a plaintiff's opening statement outline only from evidence you list as admissible and expected, with a table mapping every statement to the witness or exhibit that will prove it and a list of statements removed for lack of proof.
Pro members get the Prompt Runner: fill in variables, choose your model, and get output with anti-hallucination checks.
See Plans* These prompts are drafting and analysis aids for licensed attorneys. They are not legal advice and do not replace professional judgment. AI output can contain errors, including invented citations and incorrect deadlines: verify every fact, figure, authority and deadline against primary sources before relying on it. Rules vary by jurisdiction, and you remain responsible for the final work product.