ChatGPT Prompt: Summarize a Case in 6 Structured Sections
Drop in a case name and get a tight 6-section brief — citation, facts, issues, holding, reasoning, and subsequent treatment.
The Prompt
Variables (1)
| Variable | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
| {{case_name}} | Case Name | Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803) |
Expected Output
A 6-section case brief: citation, key facts, issues, holding, reasoning with quotes, and subsequent treatment.
Usage Notes
ChatGPT hallucinates case quotes routinely. Always verify in Westlaw, Lexis, or the official reporter before citing in a brief.
Originally featured in: ChatGPT Prompts for Lawyers: The Complete Guide
Related Prompts
Claude Prompt: Comprehensive Research Memo + Statute Analysis
Two heavy-research prompts in one: an Am Law 100 research memorandum and a section-by-section statute and regulation breakdown with compliance obligations.
Gemini Prompt: Compare Statutes Across Multiple Jurisdictions
Compare statutes across three jurisdictions in a side-by-side table covering citations, definitions, deadlines, penalties, and the strategic differences that matter.
ChatGPT Prompt: Compare Two Jurisdictions for Forum Selection
Build a side-by-side jurisdiction comparison covering statutes, elements, trends, and strategic forum-selection considerations.
The Five Core Principles of Prompt Engineering for Lawyers in 2026
A reference summary of the five core principles of legal prompt engineering — role, jurisdiction, context, structured output, anti-hallucination — proven across 200+ tests.