Strategicmodel-agnosticcorporatedelaware

Draft Material Adverse Change Clause: Pro-Buyer vs Pro-Seller

Generate a Material Adverse Change definition in two versions, pro-buyer broad and pro-seller narrow with carve-outs, plus annotations on which provisions face the strongest pushback.

The Prompt

This prompt is part of the strategic tier

Get instant access to the full prompt — plus 2 guided input fields, anti-hallucination checks, and the Prompt Runner.

Preview prompt structure
— Interest Toggle: MAC Definition

Generate a Material Adverse Change (MAC) definition for a $[X]M acquisition
in the [industry] sector.

VERSION 1 - PRO-BUYER:
- Broad MAC definition covering financial performance, customer relationships,
  key employee departures, regulatory changes, and ind...

Variables (2)

VariableDescriptionExample
{{deal_size}}Deal Size (USD millions)250
{{industry}}Industry Sectorspecialty chemicals manufacturing

Expected Output

Two complete MAC clause drafts (pro-buyer and pro-seller) with provision-level pushback annotations and suggested compromise positions for negotiation.

Usage Notes

Use early in deal negotiation to map the negotiation gap on the MAC clause. Delaware courts construe MAC clauses narrowly (Hexion v. Huntsman, IBP v. Tyson, Akorn v. Fresenius), so even broad pro-buyer definitions rarely succeed at closing. Always cite the controlling case law for your governing state when advising the client.

Legal Sources Referenced

Originally featured in: AI for M&A Lawyers: Due Diligence, LOI Drafting & Deal Room Automation (2026)

Related Prompts