The Prompt Library
Attorney-reviewed prompts for Claude, ChatGPT, and Gemini. Filtered by practice area, jurisdiction, and task — with built-in anti-hallucination safeguards on every prompt.
Drop in a case name and get a tight 6-section brief — citation, facts, issues, holding, reasoning, and subsequent treatment.
Two client-comm prompts in one: a sophisticated 1-2 page advisory letter and a sub-500 word case status email with bulleted action items.
A polished 250-350 word post-consultation email that thanks the prospect, summarizes issues, and presents next steps and fees.
Converts a dense indemnification analysis into a 300-word plain-English email for a non-lawyer CEO, ending with three decision questions for the client to consider.
A reference summary of the five core principles of legal prompt engineering — role, jurisdiction, context, structured output, anti-hallucination — proven across 200+ tests.
Definition entry explaining what legal prompt engineering is, why lawyers need it, and how it differs from generic prompting (jurisdictional accuracy, citation control, ethics).
Convert dense legal analysis into a clear, client-friendly explanation while preserving accuracy — minimal hallucination risk.
Paste the actual statutory text and get a plain-language breakdown of requirements, applicability, exceptions, penalties, and ambiguities.
Get a jurisdiction-specific research roadmap for any legal doctrine — frameworks, statutes, and regulators, no risky case citations.
Turn a framed legal issue into Boolean searches, statutory leads, alternative theories, and judicial vocabulary for Westlaw and Lexis.
Introduction to the prompt patterns that consistently produce reliable AI output for legal research and keep models inside the safe zone.
Drop in two versions of any document and get a clean comparison table — substantive changes, who they favor, risk levels, and ready-to-send counter-proposals.
One reusable template for first drafts of any legal document — feed in document type, practice area, brief facts, client type, and jurisdiction.
Configure Claude as a research assistant with confidence tagging, citation-fabrication bans, IRAC output, and a built-in verification checklist for every claim.
Configure Claude as a legal communication specialist that switches tone and structure across five recipient profiles, with built-in formatting and ethics guardrails.
A meta-guide on the four most common Claude system prompt pitfalls for law firms — bloat, contradictions, over-constraining, ignoring model updates — plus versioning advice.
Pro members get the Prompt Runner: fill in variables, choose your model, run the prompt, and get output with anti-hallucination checks and reasoning traceability.